


The Government bases its fiscal projections on the average
private-sector economic forecast.
This practice was started in 1994, following an independent review of the
Department of Finance’s forecasting practices. This approach was also endorsed
in the 2005 review of the Department’s forecasting practices, led by Tim
O’Neill.
The rationale for using the private sector average is that it introduces an
element of independence into the fiscal forecast.
Since September, the economic situation has been very fluid. As a result the
Department surveyed private sector forecasters three times since September. The
final survey was completed on November 14th, less than two weeks before the
Economic and Fiscal Statement was tabled.

In July 2008, the Blue Chip Consensus forecast (a U.S. survey of about
50 private sector forecasters) for the U.S. was calling for growth of 1.7 per
cent in 2009. By December 2008, the consensus forecast was calling for a
contraction of 1.1 per cent.
Similarly, the Blue Chip consensus forecast for Canada in July 2008 was for the
economy to grow by 2.3 per cent in 2009. The most recent forecast is for a
contraction of 0.1 percent.
|
Blue Chip Consensus Survey Forecast for 2009 Real GDP Growth
|
||
|
Date of Forecast
|
Canada
|
United States
|
|
July 2008
|
2.3
|
1.7
|
|
August 2008
|
2.1
|
1.5
|
|
September 2008
|
2.0
|
1.5
|
|
October 2008
|
1.2
|
0.5
|
|
November 2008
|
0.5
|
-0.4
|
|
December 2008
|
-0.1
|
-1.1
|

The process used to generate the economic forecast in the Statement
was consistent with past practice. However, given the uncertainty in the
economic outlook and the Government’s assessment that the risks to the outlook
were largely tilted to the downside, the Statement set out a range of outcomes
for the economic outlook.
For real GDP (a measure of the volume of production) the average private sector
forecast was for 0.3 per cent growth in 2009, with a low forecast of -0.7 per
cent and a high of 1.0 per cent.
The range was even wider for nominal GDP growth, which takes into account
changes in prices of goods and services produced in Canada. The forecasts for
nominal GDP ranged from a decline of 2.5 per cent to an increase of close to the
same magnitude.
|
Private Sector Forecasters
|
|||
|
Bank of Montreal
|
Conference Board of Canada
|
Banque Laurentienne
|
Royal Bank
|
|
Caisse de dépot et placement du
Québec
|
Desjardins
|
Merrill Lynch
|
Scotiabank
|
|
Centre for Spatial Economics
|
Deutsche Bank of Canada
|
National Bank Financial
|
TD Bank
|
|
CIBC World Markets
|
Global Insight
|
University of Toronto
|
UBS Warburg
|

Before accounting for the actions proposed in the Statement, the
Government’s fiscal projection was for a balanced budget in 2008-09, followed by
deficits over the subsequent three years.
To allow for a comparison of different views on the fiscal position of the
government, the Statement also set out the fiscal projections of four private
sector organizations. These organizations use their own economic forecasts in
preparing these projections.
This year, the projections can also be compared to those of the Parliamentary
Budget Officer (PBO), which were released one week earlier.
For the next three fiscal years, two of the private sector organizations, as
well as the Parliamentary Budget Officer, projected smaller status quo deficits
than the Government. Two of the private sector organizations projected larger
deficits than the Government.
Note that all of these projections were consistent with the proposed changes to
the Equalization program outlined by the Minister of Finance at the November 3,
2008 Federal-Provincial-Territorial Finance Ministers meeting.

The Economic and Fiscal Statement took action to protect the
Government’s structural fiscal position. The Statement proposed measures to
reinforce the stability of the financial system in Canada by
The Statement launched a discussion of possible stimulus for the weakening
economy and action to bolster long-term growth prospects.

As
this chart shows, in the absence of actions announced on November 3rd to put the
Equalization program on a sustainable path and the measures proposed in the
Statement, the Government would have recorded deficits in each of the next five
years. This would have threatened the structural fiscal position of the
Government.
The actions proposed in the Statement addressed this situation.

After
taking into account these proposed actions, the Economic and Fiscal Statement
projected balanced budgets or better.
Recognizing the significant downside risks and the wide range of private sector
forecasts, the Statement also provided a range of fiscal outcomes, based on the
average of the two highest and the two lowest private sector forecasts of
nominal GDP growth.
The Statement noted that, “given the volatility of the economic situation and
the rapid decline in commodity prices, a deficit cannot be ruled out.”
In addition, the Statement noted that “to the extent that actions to protect the
economy or further deterioration in global economic conditions lead to a
deficit, the Government will ensure that the deficit is temporary.”


One
month ago, the IMF was expecting global growth to slow to 2.2 per cent in 2009,
well below the 3.5 per cent level generally associated with a global recession.
Since the IMF published its outlook in November, the outlook for a number of
large economies has worsened.
On December 9, the Bank of Canada reduced its policy rate by 75 basis points
to 1½ per cent, the lowest policy rate since 1958.
At the same time, the Bank of Canada also stated that Canada’s economy “is now
entering a recession as a result of the weakness in global economic activity”.

As a
result of this new information, the U.S. contraction in the fourth quarter of
2008 is now expected to be sharper than believed at the time of the Statement.
Expectations for the first half of 2009 have also been lowered.
This is reflected in the December 10th Blue Chip Consensus forecast, which now
calls for the U.S. economy to contract by 1.1 per cent in 2009, down from 0.4
per cent only one month ago.
Many of these forecasts already incorporate some further fiscal stimulus in the
U.S.

|
Crude Oil Prices, $US/bbl
|
||
|
|
Futures Price
for 2009
|
Private Sector Survey
for 2009
|
|
Week of November 14 - Survey
|
64.17
|
72.0
|
|
Week of November 28 - Statement
|
59.32
|
|
|
Week of December 5
|
52.68
|
|
|
Week of December 12
|
52.87
|
55.7
|

This chart shows that the US downturn is becoming progressively more severe.
On November 28th, the National Bureau of Economic Research indicated that the
U.S. recession began almost one year ago -- in January 2008.
Since December 2007 the US has lost 1.9 million jobs.
In contrast, employment in Canada has remained relatively stable over much of
2008. However, employment fell sharply in November and most private sector
forecasters now expect that Canada entered a recession in October of 2008 -- ten
months after the US entered recession.

The
Department surveyed private sector forecasters in the past week. As of December
12th, private sector forecasters expect that real GDP will contract in 2009 by
0.4 per cent. One month ago, as of November 14th, the average forecast called
for an increase of real GDP of 0.3 per cent.
Further the level of nominal GDP is expected to be about $20 billion lower in
each of the next two years.
This suggests that revenues will be weaker than projected in the November
Statement.
Private sector forecasters also expect that interest rates and inflation will
now be somewhat lower than in November, which would in turn lower the cost of
indexed programs and public debt charges below that presented in the statement.

This is the chart presented earlier, showing the range of outcomes for the
budgetary balance set out in the Economic and Fiscal Statement.
Based on the update private sector forecast, the fiscal projection of the
budgetary balance for the next two years would be about half-way between the
average and low scenarios set out in the Statement.
In the Department’s view, there is a risk that nominal GDP could be weaker than
suggested by the most recent private sector survey and that the corresponding
fiscal outcome would be more in line with the low scenario in the Statement.