February 25, 2005
Archived - Notes for Remarks by The Honourable Ralph Goodale, P.C., M.P., Minister of Finance to the Empire Club of Canada and Canadian Club of Toronto
Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Check against delivery
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your invitation to be here today. Good afternoon and greetings and good wishes from the Government of Canada.
I'm very grateful to the Canadian Club and the Empire Club for this opportunity. For the past 40 hours or so, I've been doing non-stop interviews-I think 35 of them now-in a kind of disembodied way with various members of the media talking about the budget. I'm glad, actually, to be in a room with the opportunity to talk to some real people about the budget instead of through all of the marvels of technology. Now in all of that I mean no disrespect to the journalists. I have a very healthy regard for what they do. Indeed, I used to be one of them.
Back in my early days in Regina when I was going to university, I was a news editor for the CBC, and I remember doing the early morning news run when I was about the only one in the building except me and the other guy who read the news. And I was pounding away on an old Underwood typewriter; that's long before technology. And I had this problem with getting letters in the wrong order and very often when I went to hit the "u" it would come out almost invariably as an "o". And one day I was writing this rather lengthy story about the former Soviet Union. And three times in about a 60-second news clip I meant to type "Soviet Union" and it came out "Soviet Onion." And I put the news script together and rushed into the booth about 30 seconds to air time, handed it to the announcer, went back to my desk and I was flipping through the script and I noticed this "Soviet Onion." And I thought, now should I dash back in there and explain this? And I thought no, this is just far too obvious. Nobody would make this mistake. I flipped on the monitor and I listened to the newscast, and three times in the space of 60 seconds the announcer duly intoned the "Soviet Onion." I went to the door of the news booth and I said"Why did you do that?" And he said"Boy"-I was a lot younger then-he said"Boy, I am not paid to write the news. I am not paid to edit the news. I am paid to read the news. And I read it just exactly the way you wrote it." And you know, some 35 years later on the other side of the microphone, I'm looking for some journalist, any journalist, anywhere that will read it exactly the way I wrote it.
Now I would concede that that's pretty tough to do with a budget speech that went on for 75 minutes. But let me just summarize for you today a lot more briefly than that what this federal budget for 2005 was seeking to accomplish.
And I had three primary goals. First, I wanted to spell out without doubt that Canada's economic performance continues to be impressive by every national and international standard and that Canada's fiscal fundamentals are very, very robust. And why is that important? It's important because a strong economy and prudent, disciplined fiscal behaviour are the enablers. They make possible everything else that Canadians want to achieve.
Twelve to fifteen years ago, this country was in some pretty deep fiscal difficulty. We were trapped then in a vicious cycle of deficits and debt, high taxes and high interest rates, slow economic growth and sometimes no growth at all, jobs being shredded, social programs that were in very real jeopardy. And then Canadians decided that the course must change and they demanded a new plan.
Between 1993 and 1997, we ended the previous record of a quarter of a century of skyrocketing public debt. We balanced the Government's books. We started to accumulate surpluses and we put the debt on a steady downward track. It took some tough decisions-some of them controversial decisions. But Canadians overall supported what had to get done.
And with what results now eight or nine years later? We now have: eight consecutive balanced budgets and at least five more in the forecast; a debt ratio that's on its way down to 25 per cent from what used to be 68 per cent; a triple-A credit rating; the best job creation record; the fastest growth in living standards; and the only government surpluses in all of the G-7 group of world leading economies. And we have the best fiscal performance of any Canadian government since 1867.
With this economic and fiscal strength, we have reinvested in the economic and the social priorities of Canadians. We have reduced the tax burden. We have helped to stimulate 1 million net new jobs since the year 2000, 2 million since 1997 and 3 million since 1993. And we have coped with sudden unforeseen emergencies like the 9/11 tragedy or SARS and BSE and the Asian tsunami without getting pushed back into the red once again, despite the expense associated with those emergencies.
The key to this kind of fiscal resilience and fiscal freedom is prudent planning. First, in assessing the nation's economic outlook, we do not do it in-house with government economists only. Neither do we pick one or two of our favourite economists from outside government just to tell us what we want to hear. We regularly consult 15 to 20 of Canada's leading economic analysts in the private sector. Their forecasting data is then run through four different econometric modelling firms, again all from the private sector. And we take the average of these results from the outside experts, and that is what sets the fiscal framework for budget-planning purposes.
Secondly, we consciously do not use up all the available fiscal space with either spending initiatives or tax cuts. Instead, we explicitly build in some fiscal shock absorbers to give us the capacity each year to deal with the unexpected. Altogether, over the coming five years, this cushion, to ensure that we will stay in balance, amounts to more than $25 billion. If it proves not to be needed to cope with those contingencies, then $15 billion out of that cushion over five years, or $3 billion per year, is earmarked for further debt reduction. The rest can be invested in priority programs and services if it too is not needed to safeguard against any risk of a deficit.
Now I mention all of this as my point number one today to reinforce as emphatically as I can that all the Government's fiscal anchors are fully in place and fully in force in this budget and over the coming five years. The same prudent practices and disciplined behaviours that brought us so successfully from 1993 to 2005 continue to apply.
Based on the best private sector advice, we are expecting annual economic growth rates in the 3 per cent range going forward. But there are downside risks. We are a trading nation. Eighty per cent of our exports go to the United States. The so-called twin deficits in the U.S.-their current account deficit and their budgetary deficit-could lead to higher interest rates or slower growth or a further depreciation in the American dollar-any of which could negatively affect us here in Canada. So we need to remain vigilant and prudent, and we are.
My second main budget objective was to deliver or better on the specific promises that we made to Canadians during the federal election campaign in the summer of 2004. Promises made must be promises kept and my budget delivered on those commitments. On new funding for the provinces and the territories, especially for health care, we have negotiated new agreements with all of the premiers. We have put the legislation before Parliament and it's well along in the parliamentary process, and the budget booked the promised money through the Canada Health Transfer and through equalization. Over 10 years it will total an incremental $75 billion.
On cities and communities, we promised to share with local governments up to 50 per cent of the federal gas tax revenues and the budget delivered exactly that. In the coming year we will actually start at $600 million in revenue sharing and ramp up from there to reach an annual federal transfer for cities and communities of $2 billion per year. It will be ongoing and it will be in addition to our regular federal infrastructure programs, not instead of them.
On the well-being of children, my budget delivered on our commitment to provide $5 billion over five years for a new national Early Learning and Child Care initiative-one rooted in the principles of high quality, universality, accessibility and developmental content. And we signalled our intent to be in for the long haul with our provincial and territorial partners.
On senior citizens, people with disabilities and their caregivers, the budget delivered on a full range of commitments, including $2.7 billion to enrich the Guaranteed Income Supplement and the doubling of a tax credit for caregivers.
On the huge needs of Aboriginal people, we promised an inclusive process involving Aboriginal leaders with the prime minister, the premiers, federal ministers, provinces and territories to build a compelling national action plan on Aboriginal health, education, housing, economic development, land claims and accountability. That process in the last year has become well advanced. There'll be further meetings this spring and summer, and the process will culminate in a formal federal-provincial-territorial first ministers' meeting with Aboriginal leaders in the fall of this year. But in the meantime, the budget delivered about $1.4 billion for downpayments on better health, education, children's services and housing.
On all these and other fronts, I'm very pleased to say that we have done in this budget exactly what we promised to do last summer.
My third objective in the budget was to describe the path forward for Canada, where we want to go and how we plan to get there over the next five years-build around greater productivity, enhanced environmental sustainability and an influential respected role for Canada in global affairs.
The productivity agenda is always important, but especially in light of that higher-valued Canadian dollar and the huge demographic changes that are coming just around the corner as the big baby boomer generation begins to retire. So the budget laid out measures for a more inclusive workforce-more inclusive of Aboriginal people, new immigrants, people with disabilities and young parents who want to pursue their careers while also caring properly for their young families. The budget also put more money into workplace skills and literacy and into our highly successful innovation agenda to promote higher learning, science and new technology development, particularly at institutions of post-secondary education.
We're investing heavily in high-quality public infrastructure. We're promoting more open internal and external trade, smarter regulatory systems including in financial services and securities.
And we are reducing the tax burden. Personal taxes will come down through an increase in the basic tax-free personal amount. Over five years, Canadians will save more than $7 billion from this tax cut. Nearly 900,000 low-income people will be taken off the tax rolls altogether including about a quarter of a million senior citizens. For those in a higher tax bracket, RRSP limits are being raised and we are removing the restrictions on investments in foreign properties.
On the corporate side, we are eliminating the 1987 surtax and we're gradually bringing the income tax rate down by two points to preserve our competitive advantage vis-à-vis the United States and to keep investment and jobs in Canada. We'll also be improving capital cost allowances-not just this year, but I think every year going forward to better reflect the useful life of capital assets.
On the environment and sustainability, our investments will total at least $7.5 billion. To better deal with the challenge of climate change, we are introducing a full suite of actions, new market-based mechanisms to harness the power of competition in the private sector, new tax measures, new incentives for both consumers and for business, new investment in innovation and new scope for both regulatory and voluntary action.
To provide just a few examples, we are creating a new Clean Climate Fund to invest in some exciting new fields of activity like carbon capture and storage, clean coal and a possible east-west power grid, while also facilitating a liquid market for domestic emissions trading. We are quadrupling our investment in wind power. We are quadrupling our investment in residential energy retrofits and we're providing an accelerated capital cost allowance on certain environmental investments of a full 50 per cent.
Beyond climate change, my budget also makes major environmental investments in brownfields remediation, protecting the integrity of our national parks and extending the Great Lakes Action Plan. All in all, environmental groups have described this as probably the greenest budget in Canadian history.
To better position Canada in global affairs as a strong and respected citizen of the world, our government has undertaken a comprehensive international policy review, which will be forthcoming in the next few weeks. In the meantime, the budget took some major steps forward.
For new troops and reserves, for better infrastructure and operational sustainability, and for new equipment and materiel, we are investing on a cash basis $13 billion in the Canadian Armed Forces over the next five years, and that will be the biggest contribution in some 20 years.
For air and marine security, border security, police and emergency preparedness, we are investing another $1.2 billion.
For greater foreign aid and international assistance, we are booking $3.4 billion over the next five years. Among many other things, this will position Canada as a global leader in the fight against AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and polio.
We all recall the outpouring of human emotion and human generosity in response to that terrible tragedy of the tsunami in South Asia. And the response from Canadians and from governments around the world was entirely necessary and entirely appropriate as the world tried to come to the rescue insofar as that was humanly possible. But when you think of the situation in Africa, which did not have much of the effect of the tsunami-some, but it was relatively small-in Africa people die of AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and polio at a rate equivalent to a tsunami every single month. So that's why we're putting some money in that direction.
And the budget also seeks to confirm our leadership in reducing the crushing burden of debt on some of the world's poorest countries. Canada has always been a world leader in that regard and we are going to maintain that leadership role. It is for reasons like these that people as diverse as the rock star Bono and the Secretary General of the United Nations Kofi Annan have said with a common voice that what the world truly needs is more Canada. And as we build upon that for the future, Canada will indeed have a vigorous role to play in global affairs.
The purpose of this budget, therefore, was to reinforce a number of points. We want to build a competitive, productive, 21st century Canadian economy-one that is knowledge-based, technology-driven, highly skilled and excellent by every possible measure.
We want to build an inclusive and caring society-a society in which fairness and equality of opportunity are the measures of our progress.
We want a country that is clean and green, which prizes a natural heritage of extraordinary richness and preserves it with great care.
And we want to be a confident people, respected and trusted not just within our borders but indeed as model citizens of the world.
Those are the objectives to which the budget spoke, and I hope that we've moved ourselves along the way toward the future.
Thank you very much.